http://www.qha.com.ua/haber2.php?id=1676
Translate using “google translate”
30.07.2009
Head of Foreign Relations of the Mejlis of Crimean Tatar people Hamzin Ali commented on a statement by People’s Deputy of Ukraine Inna Theological program «Radio-cutting» to «Trans-M-Radio», which went on the air on 26 July, at 16.00. Recall that the Theological opponent in the program, the theme which has become a very phony and artificial Moderate question «Crimean Tatar?», Became President of the World Congress of the Crimean Tatars, the First Deputy Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people Refat Chubarov.
«Before the presidential election campaign in Ukraine is just over one month – writes Ali Hamzin. – It should start on 19 September, when the current President of Ukraine signed the Law of Ukraine «On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine concerning the election of the President of Ukraine», which was adopted on July 24, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and in accordance with which the company could begin for a month later, on 19 October. Until we see a process of active candidates for the President of Ukraine, but a well-known Ukrainian politician Inna Bogoslavskaya, does not hide his desire in 2010 to run for the Presidents of Ukraine, was almost beginning to position itself as one of the applicants for the post.
This is especially noticeable when you read interviews Inna Theological site From-UA dated June 17, 2009 (http://www.from-ua.com/politics/91c7c044eb3f2.html), which was organized in the online video-conference. It it, responding to questions that are already addressed as a candidate for the President of Ukraine, criticizing the current President, to express the principles in the context of its position: «I am never going in such a president». In the same spirit can be perceived and its performance in the transfer of «Radio-cutting» to «Trans-M-Radio» July 24, which also took part and the President of the World Congress of the Crimean Tatars Refat Chubarov. This channel was devoted to the position of Inna Theological, announced its July 11, 2009 at a press conference in Simferopol, where she stated that it is necessary to halt a three-year repatriation of Crimean Tatars, in order to conduct their “full inventory of real Crimean Tatar population in Ukraine”.
By the way, leading the program Paul Kazarin Innu Germanovna introduced listeners, as a candidate for the President of Ukraine, that it is untrue and grossly violated certain provisions of «the Law on Elections of the President of Ukraine». If ignorance of the law excusably leading broadcast, the Inna Bogoslovskaya as a professional lawyer, is well aware of the significance of this error. But do not hide, even for me and it made no particular impression. I am also not divideth the its position on the need to suspend the return, repatriation of Crimean Tatars in Crimea. In the end, its position is in the personal relationship to our national problem. I fully agree with the position of Refat Chubarova, who noted that her idea of the inventory of the Crimean Tatar people in Ukraine recalls the history of fascist regimes, which are also under all sorts of pretexts, always strive to rewrite the number of people hostile to the regime.
I just want to add that Ina Theological obviously cunning, when trying to explain the reason for stopping the repatriation of the Crimean Tatars care about them, ostensibly, willing to improve the social conditions of those who have returned to Crimea. Among the solutions of the issues, it promises to build a Crimean Tatar schools and even organize movies in cinemas on the Crimean Tatar language. Of course, such statements could lead to sympathy and, if it had not asked Chubarova a number of issues, meaning that, as they say, «has delivered its full head» and demonstrated the true reason for its initiative to halt a three-year repatriation of Crimean Tatars in Crimea.
This is – a question concerning our compatriots, currently living in the countries of the Balkan region and Turkey. She is very concerned about the question whether the Crimean Tatars from these countries for the repatriation, return to the Crimea. Moreover, it called on the Crimean Tatars to renounce the idea of national autonomy, the political position of integration of Ukraine into Euro-Atlantic community and appeals to the international organizations and the public to solve their national problems. Parliament and our main goal for the restoration of our national autonomy doderpatatsionnogo period, she openly called separatist. The meaning of these issues and proposals clearly argue for other causes of anxiety are so severe and emotionally forced to turn to the Crimean Tatar People’s Deputy topic in Ukraine.
It should also be noted that Ina Bogoslavskaya first confronted with the Crimean Tatar issue is not at his press conference in Simferopol on 11 July. I remember a few years ago it was, on the Crimean television and outraged «samozahvatami» Crimean Tatars, as they were called, even when required to stop the return of Crimean Tatars. Therefore, in discussing this issue and speaking with the idea of stopping the repatriation of Crimean Tatars in Ukraine, it is, I am convinced, long before the conference knew that the resonance falls in the top ten.
But all of the above does not surprise me (the Crimean Tatars all to hear in the course of their struggle and return to their homeland) and the reason for writing this short note is quite different. I want to draw attention more on the legal and juridical aspects of the proposal Theological initiatives.
First, it is peremptory and humiliating many hundreds of people are its claim that the problem of Crimean Tatars in Ukraine, no one does. For People’s Deputy, this issue since the collapse of the Soviet Union engaged in specially designed structures, such as: the State Committee for Nationalities and Religions, and The National Committee for Interethnic Relations and deported citizens. In my view, the relative stability and peace in the Crimea is saved thanks to their activities. Another issue that the budget allocated to these structures on the return and settlement, is catastrophically low and usually not enough to address the whole range of issues related to deportation, including the Crimean Tatars.
Secondly, in nature there is no public act of Ukraine, allowing the return of Crimean Tatars in Crimea, of which Mrs. Theological spoke, and which allegedly carried out the repatriation, the return of Crimean Tatars in Crimea. This assertion is clearly incompetent and misleading listeners Crimea.
For the public, repatriation, and immigration is more accurate if the Crimean Tatars in Ukraine in the Crimea is happening in full accordance with Ukrainian legislation, the Constitution, the Laws «On citizenship», «On Immigration», «On the legal status of foreigners and persons without citizenship», « On the legal status of foreign Ukrainians », and others. These laws are clearly defined to acquire Ukrainian citizenship and immigration to its territory for any person, «regardless of race, color, political, religious or other beliefs, sex, ethnic or social origin, property status, place of residence, linguistic or other traits », if they are subject to st.8 Law of Ukraine« On Citizenship of Ukraine »- the acquisition of Ukrainian citizenship by geographical origin. Is well known that the Crimean Tatars and all our people, it is in conformity with this article, which defines a number of simplified procedures and the process of immigration to Ukraine today to return to their homeland. It should be understood that the return of Crimean Tatars in Crimea, in Ukraine the legal space provided is not their nationality or status of the deportees, as belonging to Ukraine, «on the territorial origin».
In addition, the return of Crimean Tatars, and is governed by the provisions of an international instrument «Agreement on matters relating to the restoration of the rights of deported persons, national minorities and peoples». The document was signed on 9 October 1992 in Bishkek, and carried into the following 10 years during the summer of 2003 at a meeting of CIS leaders in St. Petersburg. This international instrument ratified by the Law of Ukraine № 1501-VI dated February 18, 2004 and valid until 2013.
And thirdly, how the effect of the above documents governing the return of Crimean Tatars in Crimea, one can stop us in relation to three years, a simple bill, on the development of which, as I understood from the transmission already has orders Inna Germanovna.
It is my deep conviction, though not a professional lawyer as Inna Bogoslovskaya first need to stop or cancel the international Bishkek Agreement deported. Then, in the preamble to the Ukrainian laws on citizenship, the Immigration and others need to add a small correction, but is clearly a racist nature «has no effect on the nationality of the Crimean Tatar people». And then the distinguished People’s Deputy, may reach its goal if the fellow (they have yet to find!) In the country’s parliament to support its initiative to halt the return of deportees to the Ukraine on the basis of nationality. But would like to warn that Ukraine will then clearly recall the well-known in human history, the apartheid regime of South Africa mid-twentieth century. I am sure the idea would be to distance Theological even those MPs who are in the Verkhovna Rada has traditionally opposed the decision of problems of Crimean Tatars in Ukraine.
Involuntarily ask: what constitutes a man, and what its true purpose, which is being a professional lawyer, make loud statements, ignoring the well-known rules of their profession? I earnestly request the distinguished Innu Germanovna, first to examine all information relating to the Crimean Tatar factor in the Ukraine and, especially, legal documents and accumulated practices that contribute to addressing issues and problems associated with it. And even better, to engage in the improvement of population in the Crimea in order to get broad support in his presidential campaign, which clearly can help to overcome the level of technical candidates ».
Leave a comment